Bog Myrtle & Peat

Life and Work in Galloway


Wholesale Destruction

A sight for sore eyes

I lost my temper on Saturday, and I took it out on some sitka spruces. For three years, I’ve been experimenting with ways of making mature sitkas a little more amenable to black grouse. My experiments have been based in a five hundred yard long windbreak which, at its widest, is just over thirty yards. I’ve hollowed out rides, thinned, brashed and bothered the trees until they have finally started to take on a different appearance, but there is nothing quite so satisfying as going for the total “destruction” option. My new technique is to fell trees onto one another, until there are just one or two bearing the weight of a dozen leaning trees. I can then let gravity and a brisk southwesterly wind do the rest.

There was a trend in black grouse conservation a few years ago which encouraged the formation of a “scalloped” woodland edge, in order to break up the hard lines between trees and open moorland. In retrospect, I see that what I’ve done is something similar to “scalloping”, but this is a happy accident. The felled area is that shape because I got tired and could hardly swing the chainsaw into another trunk, leaving a neat but wholly coincidental seventy yard long bay of fallen trees in the side of the strip.

With the possible exception of automatic air fresheners, I hate sitka spruce trees more than anything else in the world. It would be impossible to find a single thing that has caused more damage to the Southern Uplands than sitka spruce trees over the past century, and nothing makes my blood boil like the appearance of self sown sitka saplings on open moorland. Surrounded on three sides by commercial forestry, I have tried to work with the small sliver of sitkas on the Chayne, but I am rapidly losing patience with them. They offer nothing in the way of comfort, shelter or food for anything worth talking about, and the little benefit they do bring could be amply contributed by any number of native tree species. They are ugly, vulgar and irritatingly prickly, and I wouldn’t shed a tear if I never saw one again.

These trees will lie where they fell. It’s incredibly awkward to remove timber from this stretch of the wood, so as they rot down in the next few years, I’ll cover over their ugly remains with some birches and rowans. A few rowans were surviving on the fringe of the wood which has been cleared, and I hope that they now get some much deserved breathing space. A few more stress busting sitka destruction sessions and the wood will be all the better for it. Gradually exchanging spruces with native trees is proving to be extremely satisfying…



One response to “Wholesale Destruction”

  1. The problem with simply dropping trees, is it becomes an absolute pain in the arse having to fight your way into the tangled mess of eye poking branch’s,when you go to replant with your chosen native species. My experience is it takes approx 5-6 years for the felled mass to have rotted away sufficiently to make planting a realistic proposition. Even then the eye poking can be a real danger.
    What we do is fell, sned up the bigger branches and pile in a heap along with the tops and then cord and stack the trunks. This creates a series of rotting timber piles which provide habitat for invertebrates, predator spotting points etc.It also allows you to get onto the site a lot earlier and safer.for your replanting. We even do this on woodland edges.

    Make sure that any felled areas inside the shelter belt that you intend to replant are at least 3-4 times in width as the remaining standing trees. Any of the areas on the edge can be less as long as they have a southerly aspect. If they have a northerly aspect you’re back to 4 time height.

    I apologies if this is teaching your granny to suck eggs…..

Leave a comment

About

Shout on, Morgan. You’ll be nothing tomorrow

Swn y galon fach yn torri, 1952

Also at: https://andtheyellowale.substack.com